The Da Vinci Code: The facts behind the fictionAMY WELBORN
Amy Welborn points out some of the many errors about religion, history, and art contained in The Da Vinci Code in this short pamphlet.
The Da Vinci Code is a novel by Dan Brown that has held one of the top two or three places on best-seller lists since early summer. More than 3 million copies (ed: now over 40 million) are in print.
In Brown's novel, the "Da Vinci code" refers to cryptic messages supposedly incorporated by Leonardo Da Vinci into his artwork. According to the novel, Leonardo was a member of an ancient secret society called the "Priory of Sion" dedicated to preserving the "truths" that Jesus designated Mary Magdalene as His successor, that His message was about the celebration of the "sacred feminine," that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married and had children and that the Holy Grail of legend and lore is really Mary Magdalene, the "sacred feminine," the vessel who carried Jesus' children.
like an intriguing bit of lost history. Is it? Long story short: No.
legend of the Holy Grail has taken many frms throughout history, but it has always
identified the Grail as the cup Jesus used at the Last Supper. The idea of identifying
it as the "sacred feminine" and tying it into a supposed bloodline emanating from
a union of Jesus and Mary Magdalene is lifted whole cloth from the 1981 classic
of inventive esoteric wackiness, Holy Blood, Holy Grail.
Brown begins his book with a statement, under the title "Fact," that there are
documents supporting the existence of the Priory in the Bibliotheque Nationale.
These documents havelong been understood to be forgeries, placed in the archives
by an anti-Semitic supporter of the Vichy government named Pierre Plantard.
No. First, the idea that Da Vinci used any kind of code pertaining to any issue Dan Brown raises is unsupported by art historians.
Brown says that in this painting Da Vinci is telling us that the figure always identified as John the Evangelist is really Mary Magdalene, and that these two figures together form an "M," and that, because there is no grail in the picture, Da Vinci is telling us the "grail" is the sacred feminine of Mary Magdalene.
for Brown, art historians tell us that the effeminate-looking John is quite a
typical representation for the time, as is a Last Supper portrayal emphasizing
betrayal rather than the insttution of the Eucharist. In addition, the Last
Supper is a dramatization of a scene from the Gospel of John, in which the
institution narrative is not even described. No chalice? No problem. In context,
it makes sense.
Mary Magdalene is mentioned 12 times in the Gospels. She was healed of demon possession
by Jesus (Luke 8:2), was present at the Crucifixion and the tomb and was sent
by the Risen Jesus to the apostles to announce the Good News. Her feast day is
celebrated July 22.
Brown says Mary Magdalene was of royal blood, of the tribe of Benjamin, and Jesus' wife. According to Brown, after the crucifixion, Mary, pregnant with Jesus' child, moved to France and became the root of the Merovingian royal family.
also says Jesus intended for Mary to be the head of his Church (celebrating the
sacred feminine, remember) but that Peter wrested power from her, suppressed evidence
of Jesus' real intentions and set into motion a 2,000-year conspiracy to demonize
Don't ask me.
What is true is that in the sixth century, Pope Gregory the Great conflated the
figures of Mary Magdalene, the penitent woman in Luke 7, and Mary, the sister
of Martha and Lazarus, saying that before her conversion, Mary had been a prostitute
or adulteress. This has always been a disputed identification, however. Church
Fathers from St. Ambrose to St. Thomas Aquinas have been undecided on the issue,
and in the Eastern Church, the three are seen as distinct figures. This question
has never been pushed underground, either, a Dan Brown claims.
is a former English teacher who began full-time writing in 1996. His second novel,
Angels and Demons, featured the Illuminati, a vial of anti-matter and a
papal conclave. He holds no advanced degrees in religion.
All that Holy Blood, Holy Grail stuff, of course, but then there are also the Gnostic Gospels.
Gnosticism was a dualistic, esoteric mode of thinking that was widespread during the early Christian era, although its influence was not confined to Christianity. The Gnostic Gospels are works reflecting the Gnostic take on Christianity. Some have been known for centuries, but previously unknown works — in the Nag Hammadi scrolls — were discovered in Egypt in 1945.
Some modern scholars and religious writers have seized upon various passages from the Gnostic Gospels as indicative of a competing, woman-centered element of early Christianity, especially a passage fro The Gospel of Mary in which Jesus kisses Mary and the apostles express envy of His love for her. Brown works this thinking into his novel, but, like many others, ignores a deeply anti-woman passage from another Gnostic gospel, the Gospel of Thomas, in which Jesus says, "For every woman who will make herself male will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven."
Gnosticism was rejected by Christianity, but not because of gender issues. Its claims (two gods, a belief that the created world was evil) were simply inconsistent with the rule of faith, as it was called, handed down from the apostles.
canonical Gospels all date from the middle to late first century. The Gnostic
gospels cannot be placed any earlier than the mid-second century. It is ironic,
as historian James Hitchcock has pointed out, that elemets of a profession that
have for years derided the Gospels as unreliable history have now seized on later
documents as reliable guides to Jesus' intentions.
Brown has one of his fictional scholars say it's a "matter of historical record."
No nonfictional scholars would claim this. The "historical record" to which Brown
refers are those 20th-century conspiracy books, not early Christian historical
Many things may have been buried with the pyramid, including good taste, but Mary
Magdalene's bones are not among them.
No. When you read the Gospels and the letters of Paul, all of which date from the first century, you see a clear affirmation of Jesus as Lord.
The Council of Nicaea in A.D. 325 was a response to the threat of the Arian heresy, which claimed that Jesus was a semi-divine creature, not of the same being as God. This was quickly becoming a popular belief and threatening the unity of Christianity.
Emperor Constantine, aware that disunity in Christianity threatened the empire,
convened the Council. Traditional faith was re-articulated in the more precise,
philosophical terms that the heresy demanded and was accepted as the most faithful
reading of the evidence about Jesus given to us in the Gospels.
The process of discerning the authentic Gospels was a lengthy one, but it had
already begun in the early second century. Some communities used various other
Gospels, but second-century Church Fathers frequently cited the four Gospels as
authoritative. Their criteria were apostolic origins and fidelity to the rule
of faith, not gender issues. Brown's conspiracy theory is a fabrication. Moreover,
the final determinations about what constituted the Christian canon of Scripture
were made by councils held after Constantine's time.
The historical evidence simply doesn't support it. It's based on speculation and a dramatic over-reading of a couple of passages from second-century fringe writings.
It's also illogical. Brown's argument rests on the assumption that the early apostles were concerned with suppressing the scandalous and radical. If that were so, why would they have the founder of their faith executed in manner reserved for the most shameful criminals?
also is dependent on the assumption that Peter and his "party" were all about
power. For what purpose, we have to ask? Did they get rich from their "version"
of Christianity? Were they celebrated in their culture? No, they all died as despised
martyrs. Some power trip.
not. The movie rights to The Da Vinci Code have been bought by Columbia,
and Ron Howard is set to direct the film, probably to be released in 2005.
Besides being logically and historically flawed, The Da Vinci Code is filled with more minor, but no less risible, errors. Here are a few:
One of Brown's scholars says, "As the prophesied Messiah, Jesus toppled kings, inspired millions and founded new philosophies." We'd like to meet those toppled kings.
The Emperor Constantine did not make Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire in A.D. 325. It happened under Theodosius 50 years later.
Gothic architecture was not "masterminded" by the Knights Templar, a medieval military order that had nothing to do with the construction of Gothic cathedrals.
Church did not burn 5 million witches during the Middle Ages. During the period
1400-1800, an estimated 30,000-50,000 people accused of witchcraft (20 percent
of whom were men) were executed by Catholic and Protestant institutions and governments.
Amy Welborn. "The DaVinci Code: The facts behind the fiction." Our Sunday Visitor. (May, 2004).
This article is reprinted with permission from Amy Welborn. . All rights reserved. To subscribe to Our Sunday Visitor click here.
Amy Welborn writes from Indiana. She is the author of thirteen books including, De-coding Da Vinci: the truth behind the fiction of The Da Vinci Code, Decoding Mary Magdalene: Truth, Legend, and Lies, A Catholic Woma's Book of Days, Prove It! Jesus, Prove It! Church, and Prove It! Prayer. Her blog is here.
Copyright © 2004 Our Sunday Visitor
Not all articles published on CERC are the objects of official Church teaching, but these are supplied to provide supplementary information.