Frances Doesn't Get ItJOHN MALLON
A recent essay by Frances Kissling, president of Catholics for a Free Choice, entitled, "Is There Life After Roe: How to Think About the Fetus" points out the absurdity of her organization's name better than many of her critics could.
Unfortunately, so many Catholics are unschooled in Catholic philosophy — or lack a Catholic upbringing that simply assumes it — that they do not recognize the problem.
Kissling is a bomb thrower who would love to be taken for a thinker, if not an intellectual, but she doesn't seem to recognize the problem. If she does recognize the problem and does what she does anyway, it indicates a greater degree of wickedness to her activities than previously thought.
Catholicism holds that reality is Christ, the Second Person of the Trinity in whom and through whom all things were made. Human beings are made in the image and likeness of God. When the Angel Gabriel appeared to Mary and she consented to be the Mother of God, the fertilized egg in Mary's womb was that same Second Person of the Trinity: fully God, fully human. That egg did not grow into being a person, or grow in value. That little tiny egg was God — and man — from that instant.
Kissling sees reality differently. The use of terms like "choice," "freedom of choice," "a woman's right to choose," and most ridiculous of all, "anti-choice," give the game away. The abuse of this poor little word, "choice," takes the God-given gift of free will and twists it to lend legitimacy to choosing evil. It takes the nobility of free will to falsely lend legitimacy to the most ignoble of causes: the deliberate killing of the innocent.
As for "abortion rights," no such rights exist in nature, that is, no such right was endowed by our Creator, from whom all legitimate rights flow, as the American founding documents rightly recognized. Thus, "abortion rights" are artificial rights invented not to serve the freedom and dignity of the human being but its opposite: ugly, degrading and deadly evil. She raises the question implicit in that "choice:" Who decides?" What she doesn't get is that it has already been decided. It's not our call.
Kissling's Catholicism is belied when she places the neo-pagan, Marxist moral relativism of radical feminism above Judeo-Christian morality, judging it as superior, as though it is something the Catholic Church needs to "catch up with." The fact is the arbitrary, pseudo "morality-by-feelings" model was something cast into the abyss on the first Easter morning.
Speaking in her time, Flannery O'Connor said, "When you govern by tenderness, tenderness leads to the gas chamber." Today's version is, "When you govern by compassion, compassion leads to the abortion mill." Compassion and tenderness however good, as expressions of goodness, are all to often subjective, and therefore not a suitable measure of morality.
So for Kissling, who has spent her career campaigning to snuff out fetuses — and attacking the Catholic Church for not approving the practice — to write on "Valuing Fetal Life" is a curiosity. Perhaps it's another Blue-State plan to win over the Red-State hillbillies to the Democratic party after the election. Or perhaps the many prayers offered for Kissling are taking effect.
She speaks of "fetal rights" and degrees of humanity, calling for discussion about what point the fetus acquires them. But "degrees of humanity" is a concept used the old American slave traders and Nazis. (Doesn't Kissling realize this?) The fact is, the growing, sovereign — albeit dependent — being in its mother's womb is certainly a living being, and it is certainly human — there is no species change when exiting the birth canal. It is a human being deserving reverence, legal and moral protection, and absolute, unconditional, delightfully, gratefully-given love. Something seldom mentioned in feminist doctrine.
As the saying goes, "You can't be a little bit pregnant. You is or you ain't." While Kissling's notion of gradations of fetal value is an improvement over granting the unborn child no value at all, it is still fatally flawed and self-contradictory (as much of the essay is).
She speaks of "assigning" value to the fetus in increasing increments as the gestation goes on, which demonstrates that she still doesn't get it. Value is not something "assigned" to human beings by human beings; no matter what the circumstances, in or out of the womb — it is intrinsic to the human person at all stages of life from when sperm meets ovum to the last eyelash flicker, when, God willing, the Beatific vision comes into view as the sound of your gathered grandchildren's Hail Marys fade, and your deathbed is left behind.
John Mallon. "Frances Doesn't Get It." Catholic Online (February 2, 2005).
This article reprinted with permission from Catholic Online.
John Mallon received his bachelor's degree in theology from Boston College in 1989, where he was nominated to the Jesuit Honor Society, Alpha Sigma Nu. While at Boston College he frequently wrote articles in student newspapers in defense of the Catholic faith and during the 1989-90 school year he and a friend took over the conservative campus newspaper, The Observer of Boston College. They transformed it into an orthodox Catholic newspaper which received national acclaim. This brought him to the attention of officials at Franciscan University of Steubenville who offered him the university's Disciples of Christ Scholarship for a master's degree in theology, which he earned in 1993.
Mallon's work has appeared in The Washington Times, OpinionJournal.com, WorldNetDaily, the Boston Globe, Catholic World Report, The National Catholic Register, Crisis, The Boston Pilot and The New Oxford Review. He has been a contributor to numerous books including, "Spiritual Journeys: Towards the Fullness of Faith"; "The Madison Center Common Sense Guide to American Colleges 1991-1992"; "Operation Rescue: A Challenge to the Nation's Conscience," by Philip Lawler; and "Their Faith has Touched Us: The Legacies of Three Young Oklahoma City Bombing Victims," by Maria Ruiz Scaperlanda.
© 2005 Catholic Online
Not all articles published on CERC are the objects of official Church teaching, but these are supplied to provide supplementary information.