|
Is It Always Sinful To Wage War?ST. THOMAS AQUINASFrom his Summa Theologica St. Thomas Aquinas responds to objections to the idea of a just war and explains under what conditions war is justified.
 |
Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.
1225-1274
|
Objection 1:
It would seem that it is always sinful to wage war. Because punishment
is not inflicted except for sin. Now those who wage war are threatened by Our
Lord with punishment, according to Mt. 26:52: "All that take the sword shall perish
with the sword." Therefore all wars are unlawful. Objection
2: Further, whatever is contrary to a Divine precept is a sin. But
war is contrary to a Divine precept, for it is written (Mt. 5:39): "But I say
to you not to resist evil"; and (Rm. 12:19): "Not revenging yourselves, my dearly
beloved, but give place unto wrath." Therefore war is always sinful. Objection
3: Further, nothing, except
sin, is contrary to an act of virtue. But war is contrary to peace. Therefore
war is always a sin. Objection 4:
Further, the exercise of a lawful thing is itself lawful, as is evident
in scientific exercises. But warlike exercises which take place in tournaments
are forbidden by the Church, since those who are slain in these trials are deprived
of ecclesiastical burial. Therefore it seems that war is a sin in itself. On
the contrary, Augustine says in a sermon on the son of the centurion: "If the
Christian Religion forbade war altogether, those who sought salutary advice in
the Gospel would rather have been counselled to cast aside their arms, and to
give up soldiering altogether. On the contrary, they were told: 'Do violence to
no man . . . and be content with your pay' [Lk. 3:14]. If he commanded them to
be content with their pay, he did not forbid soldiering." I answer that, In
order for a war to be just, three things are necessary. First,
the authority of the sovereign by whose command the war is to be waged.
For it is not the business of a private individual to declare war, because he
can seek for redress of his rights from the tribunal of his superior. Moreover
it is not the business of a private individual to summon together the people,
which has to be done in wartime. And as the care of the common weal is committed
to those who are in authority, it is their business to watch over the common weal
of the city, kingdom or province subject to them. And just as it is lawful for
them to have recourse to the sword in defending that common weal against internal
disturbances, when they punish evil-doers, according to the words of the Apostle
(Rm. 13:4): "He beareth not the sword in vain: for he is God's minister, an avenger
to execute wrath upon him that doth evil"; so too, it is their business to have
recourse to the sword of war in defending the common weal against external enemies.
Hence it is said to those who are in authority (Ps. 81:4): "Rescue the poor: and
deliver the needy out of the hand of the sinner"; and for this reason Augustine
says: "The natural order conducive to peace among mortals demands that the power
to declare and counsel war should be in the hands of those who hold the supreme
authority." Secondly,
a just cause is required, namely that those who are attacked, should be
attacked because they deserve it on account of some fault. Wherefore Augustine
says: "A just war is wont to be described as one that avenges wrongs, when a nation
or state has to be punished, for refusing to make amends for the wrongs inflicted
by its subjects, or to restore what it has seized unjustly." Thirdly,
it is necessary that the belligerents should have a rightful intention,
so that they intend the advancement of good, or the avoidance of evil. Hence Augustine
says: "True religion looks upon as peaceful those wars that are waged not for
motives of aggrandizement, or cruelty, but with the object of securing peace,
of punishing evil-doers, and of uplifting the good." For it may happen that the
war is declared by the legitimate authority, and for a just cause, and yet be
rendered unlawful through a wicked intention. Hence Augustine says: "The passion
for inflicting harm, the cruel thirst for vengeance, an unpacific and relentless
spirit, the fever of revolt, the lust of power, and such like things, all these
are rightly condemned in war." Reply to
Objection 1: As Augustine says: "To take the sword is to arm oneself
in order to take the life of anyone, without the command or permission of superior
or lawful authority." On the other hand, to have recourse to the sword (as a private
person) by the authority of the sovereign or judge, or (as a public person) through
zeal for justice, and by the authority, so to speak, of God, is not to "take the
sword," but to use it as commissioned by another, wherefore it does not deserve
punishment. And yet even those who make sinful use of the sword are not always
slain with the sword, yet they always perish with their own sword, because, unless
they repent, they are punished eternally for their sinful use of the sword. Reply
to Objection 2: Such like precepts, as Augustine observes, should always
be borne in readiness of mind, so that we be ready to obey them, and, if necessary,
to refrain from resistance or self-defense. Nevertheless it is necessary sometimes
for a man to act otherwise for the common good, or for the good of those with
whom he is fighting. Hence Augustine says: "Those whom we have to punish with
a kindly severity, it is necessary to handle in many ways against their will.
For when we are stripping a man of the lawlessness of sin, it is good for him
to be vanquished, since nothing is more hopeless than the happiness of sinners,
whence arises a guilty impunity, and an evil will, like an internal enemy." Reply
to Objection 3: Those who wage war justly aim at peace, and so they
are not opposed to peace, except to the evil peace, which Our Lord "came not to
send upon earth" (Mt. 10:34). Hence Augustine says: "We do not seek peace in order
to be at war, but we go to war that we may have peace. Be peaceful, therefore,
in warring, so that you may vanquish those whom you war against, and
bring them to the prosperity of peace." Reply
to Objection 4: Manly exercises in warlike feats of arms are
not all forbidden, but those which are inordinate and perilous, and end in slaying
or plundering. In olden times warlike exercises presented no such danger, and
hence they were called "exercises of arms" or "bloodless wars," as Jerome states.
|