Home
| Donate
|
Subscribe/
Unsubscribe | |
Quote
of the week: "Freedom
is not the permission to do what we like, it is the power to do what we ought."
- Lord Acton |
Note from the Executive Officer: The British Columbia
College of Teachers (BCCT) is responsible for establishing standards for the education
of teachers in B.C. schools, issuing teaching certificates, and where necessary,
suspending or canceling teaching certificates. You
may recall several years ago that the BCCT made the news when it refused to certify
Trinity Western University's teacher education program because TWU asked its students
to uphold Christian standards and refrain from "
premarital sex, adultery, and
homosexual behaviour" while attending the University. It
wasn't the restriction on premarital sex and adultery that got the College hot
and bothered. It was the suggestion that homosexuality was something boys and
girls should not be engaged in while at TWU. The College maintained that even
suggesting such a thing would bias the school's graduates against homosexual persons
and make them unsuitable to teach in B.C. schools. TWU
appealed the College's decision to the B.C. Supreme Court where they won their
right to continue conducting themselves as a Christian institution and have their
teacher education school approved. The College responded by appealing to the Supreme
Court of Canada where they were smacked again by the court which ordered them
to certify the TWU program. (See a summary and analysis of this important decision
on The Centre for Cultural
Renewal web site) Well
the College is up to its tricks again. In May of this year they found Chris Kempling,
a counsellor in a Quesnel, B.C. high school and Chair of the Quesnel District
Community Health Council, guilty of conduct unbecoming a member of the B.C. College
of Teachers. Kempling's
crime wasn't the usual charge leveled against teachers facing disciplinary action
by the College sexual abuse. He was guilty of something much more heinous
in the eyes of the College, raising concerns about the pro-homosexual educational
initiatives being promoted by the B.C. teacher's union. After
reviewing Kempling's articles on this matter, the College declared "
everything
that you have written in its entirety is derogatory and discriminatory." Kempling
is to be sentenced July 25. He could possibly lose his job, but more likely he
will be publicly censured and warned not to repeat his offence at the risk of
forfeiting both job and professional reputation. When
I heard about this, I made contact with Chris Kempling and asked him to send me
a number of the same articles the College had reviewed in coming to their conclusion.
In my reading Kempling's
writing is the very model of the kind of charity, prudence, and restraint that
is absolutely necessary when raising concerns about the super-sensitive issue
of homosexual-friendly resources and our children. (See Challenging
Homophobia in Schools: A Critical Review and The
Homophobia Myth by Chris Kempling) The
points Kempling makes are well and clearly reasoned and social scientist
that he is liberally supported with responsible research from the social
scientific literature. Though a Christian, Kempling avoids arguments based on
Biblical or religious precept. His language is respectful of homosexual persons.
He raises principled objections and makes important distinctions and clarifications
and expresses himself in a thoughtful, balanced, and fair-handed way. So
what's the problem the College has with the Kempling critiques? I don't believe
for a minute it is "the way" Chris Kempling has raised his concerns; he's done
that well. Rather I suspect it's "the fact" that he's dared to challenge the teacher
union on this issue. Given
what I've seen from the College and the teacher's union, any objections to homosexual
programs, however reasonable and principled those objections may be, is ipso
facto intolerable. Many
other teachers I know don't like what's being put forward for the schools either.
The difference is, these teachers are afraid to speak out. Kempling
has something to say to them: "I
am very worried for the plight of children who are confused about their orientation
they need to hear a message of hope that there are recognized and effective
treatments for those who wish to change their orientation. My pastor asked me
if I were willing to "be a martyr for the cause". I told him I would rather be
a soldier like Gideon, who achieved a great victory against huge odds by trusting
in the Lord. I will be appealing this verdict of the College of Teachers, and
I do so for all of us who entrust our children to the public school system. Don't
leave me like Uriah, but stand with me: The righteous are as bold as a lion."
Of course the College
could surprise us; it could offer Chris Kempling specific guidelines on how to
more delicately raise his concerns without giving offense. It could do what responsible
educators do in the classroom and offer a written sample of just how objections
to this material might be raised in a manner the College finds acceptable. It
could even go so far as to demonstrate some integrity and respond in detail to
the specific problems Kempling has with the material and programs. But I'll take
my turn on Fear Factor if they do. My
prediction is that their final judgment will constitute nothing but pure and sweeping
generalizations. It has to. Given what Kempling has written I believe the College
is incapable of making a detailed critique that will stand up to scrutiny. But
I didn't want all of this to be just my opinon. I consulted a couple of philosopher
ethicist types I know just to get a second opinion. I shared around the Kempling
materials with them. My colleagues were in perfect agreement. While the College
said "everything" my advisors said "absolutely nothing" they read could be considered
derogatory and discriminatory. If
I had any clout, I'd censure the College for conduct unbecoming a professional
association, noting in my judgment that the College's treatment of Chris Kempling,
has been in "
its entirety derogatory and discriminatory". Then,
at the sentencing, I'd impose a just punishment. I'd have each member of the College
write out the Oxford English Dictionary definition of "derogatory" and "discriminatory"
100 times on the blackboard and then write a 3000 word essay on the meaning of
tolerance and free speech in a pluralistic society. Of course we'd inform them
that suitable resources for the essay can be found at the Catholic Educator's
Resource Center. So
pray for Chris Kempling just before you pray for this apostolate and remember,
if you want to sponsor a powerpoint presentation on CERC in your area write me.
God bless you. Have
a safe and fun summer. Our next update will be out toward the end of August. -
J. Fraser Field (View
our last update at: http://catholiceducation.org/updates/06.28.02.htm)
|